Pages

Saturday, September 11, 2010

Why Are Stocks Moving Higher When Everything's So Bad?

Just a couple of weeks ago it looked like all was lost: Home and auto sales were falling through the floor, unemployment showed no signs of improvement and the stock market was threatening to breach its summertime low.

NYSE traders
AP

Since then, manufacturing showed modest signs of recovery, unemployment turned out not as ugly as imagined, and the Standard & Poor's 500 [.SPX 1109.55 5.37 (+0.49%) ] is back above the psychologically important 1,100 level.

It appears that the "less-bad trade"—when the market gets a lift from things not being as bad as expected—has returned to Wall Street.

"Double-dip talk had been headline news for months. The thing a double-dip is also associated with is a pronounced decline in the equity markets," says Quincy Krosby, general strategist at Prudential Financial in Newark, N.J. "Once we were able to move double-dip talk off the front page by assuaging investor fears with better than expected macroeconomic data, investors felt better."

The result has been a two-week rally of about 5.5 percent in the S&P 500 and a sharp bullish surge in investor sentiment.

The American Association of Individual Investors weekly survey, which just two weeks ago reflected bullish sentiment of 21 percent—its worst reading since just before the March 2009 stock market lows—has more than doubled to 44 percent.



Jeff Cox
Staff Writer
CNBC.com

All this while the unemployment rate actually went up to 9.6 percent, a much-touted Institute for Supply Management reading actually saw contraction among its leading indicators, and there were only modest improvements elsewhere.

So what has changed in two weeks?

"Here you have signs that we really could be going into a double-dip recession. People for the most part are optimists by nature and are hoping for something better," says Abigail Doolittle, founder of Peak Theories Research in Albany, N.Y.

Doolittle thinks ultimately the stock market is heading for "the worst bear market of our collective lifetimes" but in the near- to mid-term is actually forming an inverse head-and-shoulders chart pattern higher.

Both Doolittle and Krosby say some more concrete forms of macroeconomic data improvement will have to appear to confirm the rally.

"If there is a rally of some sort nobody wants to miss out on it," Doolittle says. "But that in and of itself is not really going to create longer-term buying. It's enough to get us where we are now, but for the S&P to continue to move up something good is actually going to have to come out."

Indeed, other trends in the market continue to look foreboding for a major move higher.

Investors continue to flock to bond funds, pulling $513 million out of equity mutual funds and putting $2.5 billion into bond funds last week, according to Lipper data.

But the averages continue to trudge higher, rising even though September is historically the market's worst month.

Stocks rallied 7.2 percent in July on the strength of a solid earnings season, but then gave back about 2 percent in August as the weak economic data continued to pile in. Most strategists see investors at this point far more fixed on the economy than company performance, though that could change as industry conference season kicks into gear in the coming weeks.

"Macroeconomic data is continuing to drive equity prices," says Tim McCandless, senior equity strategist at Bel Air Investment Advisors in Los Angeles. "As the likelihood or chance of a double-dip looks lower, equity valuations are going to be able to move higher."

Investors remain cautious, however.

While the CBOE Volatility Index [VIX 21.97 -0.84 (-3.68%) ] remains low, the November futures contracts are trading at 28.70, a sign that options traders are expecting turbulence heading into the third-quarter earnings season and the November elections.

But investors also know that the market can continue to rise even amid a slow-gain economy.

"This is where the market is going to need conclusive evidence to break that upper end of the trading range—conclusive evidence that leading economic indicators are turning back up," Krosby says. "That question is not going to be answered until we have a couple months of solid data."


source : www.cnbc.com

US IT cos walk away with plum e-governance deals

Indian IT service providers are only just readying to tap the US government market but US IT and consultancy firms are already getting lucrative deals from India’s booming e-governance spends.

For instance, IBM, which has landed marquee contracts such as Bharti Airtel’s total outsourcing IT deal, is also a signficant player in the government projects. It is one of the vendors in the `2,000 crore Tax Net project being implemented by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, while its US rival Accenture has landed one of the contracts in the prestigious Unique ID (UID) project.

IBM, along with Hewlett Packard, is also competing with home- grown Indian service providers such as Tata Consultancy Services, Wipro, Infosys Technologies for another `2,000- crore contract, which is part of the UID project.

Microsoft is involved with the Citizen Service Centre project, while Intel is involved with the WiMax programme. Even smaller projects like LIC’s `50-crore CRM project has been awarded to IBM. But an interesting fact is that most strategic planning for e-governance in India is also done by US consulting firms, though HCL, Wipro, Infosys and TCS have consulting arms.

“US IT coompany’s get almost 80% of the consulting assignments. Any e-governance contract we execute the first two questions asked are that how will you secure the data and how will you ensure that strategic control rests with the government. But almost all consulting work is awarded to US firms which creates a security issue and which is almost always structured in a manner to benefit them in the long-run,” said an e-governance business head of a tier I IT company.

While Ernst &Young is a consultant in the Unique ID programme, PwC consults the central government on the nation’s e-governance programmes. Accenture has devised the strategy of India’s department of posts programme. “We even invite US companies to participate and look forward to them,” said a top e-governance official at the ministry of IT & communication.

IBM is one of the vendors in the `2,000-crore Income Tax Network project being implemented by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, while its US rival Accenture has landed one of the `200-crore biometric solutions contracts in the prestigious Unique ID (UID) project.

“Over 50% of the budget in e-governance projects goes towards US IT companies, even if we (Indian IT company) win an e-governance contract,” says an official involved in e-governance tendering and contracts. “That’s because most product companies like HP, Intel, AMD, Microsoft, EMC, Cisco, Red Hat are US based,” he explains.

The US government IT market is on the other hand a $77-billion untapped potential. Still none of the Indian IT companies feel that US firms should be disallowed from participating. “Nobody likes a closed market. Markets have to open. Only then we can do business. We must not do anything like this because the government of India is entitled to best service. Only by keeping our markets open can we force other markets to be open,” said TV Mohandas Pai, director HR at Infosys Technologies.

A top e-governance official at the ministry of IT & communication, who overlooks the $- billion NeGP IT spending says that Ohio ban is a discriminatory decision. “We even invite US companies to participate and look forward to them. On the other hand they have taken a drastic measure”. Regarding a possible ban of US IT companies from participating in critical e-governance tenders, he says ministry of commerce has the right to decide if they want to take it as a reciprocator measure. “Ministry of IT cannot take a policy decision on it,” he said.

Analysts also claim that the Ohio-ban is a loss of potential business opportunity for Indian IT providers in the long-term as state governments in US take a projectionist stance. “Smaller IT offshoring companies would find it more challenging as they will now have to work onshore, which might become a survival issue,” said Arup Roy, research analyst at Gartner.

Commenting on the ban, Nasscom also felt that US states should reciprocate. “The issue here is that when India doesn’t discriminate between American and Indian firms when doling out billion dollar e-governance contracts, US should also reciprocate. This is about services, but state governments in India do not discriminate too, when procuring products like IT hardware between Indian or American firms,” a Nasscom spokeswoman had told ET earlier.
“The volume of outsourcing business done by US-based companies in India is far less than the total business being done by Indian companies in the US. A counter ban could infact have negative effects on the Indian IT companies only, who depend heavily on clients in the US,” says Kumar Parakala, head IT Advisory at KPMG.

But international trade experts say that India cannot technically take up the issue under WTO rules, because the Ohio ban is against all foreign offshore providers and not against a single nation.

MindTree, which is interestingly headquaratered in New Jersey also feels that India should not react. “To be honest, the cost of this has to be decided on business sense. This is political gimmickry. At the end of the day, if you look at the last job creation data in the US, the government jobs have gone down and they should be addressing that. US reacting to this situation does not make sense,” said Krishnakumar Natarajan, CEO and MD, Mindtree.

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/ites/US-IT-cos-walk-away-with-plum-e-governance-deals/articleshow/6527303.cms
Indian Stock Market
Indian Stock Market
Cheap Car Insurance